United States Department of Unnecessary Research
| United States Department of Unnecessary Research | |
|---|---|
Seal of the department, adopted 1989. The eagle holds a magnifying glass and a second, identical magnifying glass. | |
| Agency overview | |
| Formed | October 1, 1988 |
| Preceding agency | Office of Marginal Inquiry (1961–1988) |
| Jurisdiction | Federal government of the United States |
| Headquarters | Hollis Annex, Washington, D.C. |
| Motto | Quia nemo rogavit ("Because nobody asked") |
| Employees | 4,112 (2025) |
| Annual budget | $1.94 billion (FY2026) |
| Minister responsible | Philippa Okonkwo-Hartley, Secretary |
| Agency executives |
|
| Child agencies |
|
| Website | example.org/dur |
The United States Department of Unnecessary Research (DUR) is an executive department of the United States federal government responsible for conducting, funding and archiving research into questions that are not considered to require answers. It was established by the Unnecessary Research Act of 1987 and began operations on October 1, 1988, absorbing the functions of the Office of Marginal Inquiry within the Department of Commerce.[1] The department is headed by the Secretary of Unnecessary Research, who is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate and sits nineteenth in the presidential line of succession.[lower-alpha 1]
The department's statutory mission is to "pursue, with full scientific rigour, those inquiries which no other agency, institution or reasonable person would undertake".[1] Its best-known programmes include Project Lukewarm, a 28-year effort to identify the temperature at which nobody complains; two federal phases of research into The Ben Refrigeration Hypothesis; and the insertion of The Leap Minute of 2024 into civil timekeeping. The department also publishes the Federal Register of Previously Answered Questions and, since 1991, has been the principal funder of the Journal of Applied Redundancy.[2]
The DUR has been the subject of recurring budget disputes. Critics in Congress have proposed its abolition on at least eleven occasions, most recently in 2025; defenders argue that its annual appropriation, approximately 0.03 percent of federal outlays, is a modest price for what former Secretary Eleanor Vantongeren called "the national capacity to be thorough about nothing".[3]
History
Office of Marginal Inquiry (1961–1988)
The department's predecessor, the Office of Marginal Inquiry (OMI), was created within the Department of Commerce in 1961 to study questions raised in constituent correspondence that no other federal agency was willing to answer. Its founding charter, a single page, directed it to "reply to the letters".[4] Over its 27-year existence the OMI produced 1,906 reports, including studies of whether ducks prefer stale or fresh bread (1964), the average lifespan of a lost pen (1971) and the annual number of Americans who walk into a room and forget why (1979; estimated at 211 million).[5]
By the mid-1980s the OMI's staff of 96 was unable to keep pace with its research backlog, which had grown to more than 40,000 unanswered questions. A 1985 review by the General Accounting Office concluded that the office was "underfunded for the volume of unnecessary work assigned to it" and recommended that it be either abolished or "elevated to a level commensurate with its ambitions".[5] Congress chose the second option.
Establishment
The Unnecessary Research Act was introduced in the House of Representatives in February 1987 by Representative Thaddeus M. Pellworth of Ohio and, after clearing the House in October, passed the Senate in December of that year. It became law without the President's signature on December 29, 1987.[1] The Act created the department, set its mission and established the three statutory tests of unnecessity that remain in force: that the question has no practical application, that no reasonable party has requested an answer, and that the answer, once obtained, "would not be expected to change anything".[1]
The first Secretary, Mortimer K. Hallsworth, a former OMI deputy director and specialist in domestic behaviour, was confirmed by the Senate on September 14, 1988, by a vote of 61 to 30. During his confirmation hearing he was asked by a senator what the department would accomplish. He replied, "Ideally, Senator, nothing of consequence."[2]
1990s expansion
The department grew rapidly during its first decade, from 410 employees in 1989 to 2,870 in 1999. In 1991 it launched Project Lukewarm through the newly created Bureau of Thermal Indifference, and in the same year began its long-standing grant agreement with the Journal of Applied Redundancy.[2] The 1990s also saw the opening of the National Center for Previously Answered Questions in Muncie, Indiana, which by 1998 held 2.2 million confirmed answers to questions that had been asked more than once.[6]
In 1997 the department completed its relocation from leased offices in Arlington, Virginia, to the Hollis Annex, a former federal records warehouse in Washington, D.C. The building had been scheduled for demolition, and the department reported that it had been selected "because it was not needed by anyone".[7]
2000s to present
After 2001 the department's activities came under increased scrutiny, and its budget was frozen between fiscal years 2003 and 2007. It nonetheless undertook several of its most prominent studies during this period, including the first federal phase of research into The Ben Refrigeration Hypothesis (2003–2005) and the contested Shopping Cart Directional Survey that preceded the Ohio Shopping Cart Migration of 2019.[8]
During the federal shutdown of early 2019, the department was classified as non-essential in its entirety. Its press office issued a statement describing the classification as "an external validation of the mission".[9] The department's role in inserting The Leap Minute of 2024 into civil time on December 31, 2024, drew the largest public response in its history, including 186,000 written complaints, which were subsequently archived as research material.[10]
In 2026 the department provided technical assistance to the National Strategic Toilet Paper Reserve during The Great Toilet Paper Crisis of 2026, contributing a 1998 study on the question of whether the paper should hang over or under the roll. The department stated that it was "glad to have finally found a use for it" before issuing a correction the following day clarifying that it had not.[11]
Organization
The department is led by the Secretary, assisted by a Deputy Secretary, three Under Secretaries (for Domestic Phenomena, Temporal and Thermal Affairs, and Records), and an independent Inspector General. Its operational work is divided among eight bureaus and offices, listed below.[12]
| Component | Established | Head (title) | Staff | Principal responsibilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bureau of Household Inquiry | 1988 | Gwendolyn Arbuthnot-Leigh (Director) | 812 | Domestic behaviour, appliances, furniture; The Ben Refrigeration Hypothesis |
| Bureau of Thermal Indifference | 1991 | Calvin J. Ostermeyer (Director) | 497 | Ambient temperature preference; Project Lukewarm (closed 2019) |
| Office of Temporal Adjustment | 1993 | Marisol Pettigrew-Okafor (Director) | 203 | Non-standard timekeeping; The Leap Minute of 2024 |
| Bureau of Redundant Confirmation | 1988 | Harold Tisbury (Director) | 644 | Repeating completed studies to confirm results already confirmed |
| National Center for Previously Answered Questions | 1994 | Fern D. Lachapelle (Archivist) | 388 | Archive of questions answered more than once; Muncie, Indiana |
| Office of Ambient Questions | 1999 | Desmond Okeke-Ralston (Director) | 271 | Questions that arise without being asked, including the missing sock problem |
| Office of Speculative Monetary Research | 2008 | Beatrix Hollowell (Director) | 54 | Non-standard currency systems, including the gravy standard |
| Office of Grants and the Journal | 1991 | Wendell P. Strake (Director) | 119 | External grants; funding of the Journal of Applied Redundancy |
The remaining staff serve in the Office of the Secretary, the Office of General Counsel, the Office of Public Affairs and the Office of the Inspector General. The Inspector General's annual report has, since 2004, contained a standing section titled "Instances of Unauthorized Necessity", which lists research projects found to have produced a practical benefit. The section has recorded 23 such instances; the department has disciplined staff in four of them.[13]
Research approval
Proposals for new research may originate within the department, from external grant applicants or from members of the public through the department's Question Intake Line, which has operated since 1990 and receives an average of 2,300 submissions per week.[14] Each proposal is assessed against the three statutory tests of unnecessity by a standing Review Board of seven officials. A proposal must satisfy all three tests; the board's published decisions indicate that the second test (that nobody has requested an answer) is the most frequent ground for rejection, since a proposal submitted by a member of the public is by definition a request.[lower-alpha 2][14]
Approved proposals are assigned a "unnecessity rating" from U-1 (marginally unnecessary) to U-5 (wholly unnecessary). Only U-4 and U-5 projects are eligible for multi-year funding. Project Lukewarm was rated U-5 at its inception and was downgraded to U-4 in 2004 following the placebo thermostat findings, which the board considered "faintly helpful".[13] Projects rated U-1 are typically referred to the Bureau of Redundant Confirmation, on the grounds that work which might be of some use is best confirmed until it is not.[14]
Secretaries
| No. | Name | Term | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mortimer K. Hallsworth | 1988–1993 | Former OMI deputy director |
| 2 | Adaeze Fortescue-Byrne | 1993–1999 | Launched the National Center for Previously Answered Questions |
| 3 | Gordon L. Wexcombe | 1999–2005 | Oversaw budget freeze |
| 4 | Lorraine Batchelder-Voss | 2005–2009 | Previously Under Secretary for Domestic Phenomena |
| 5 | Eleanor Vantongeren | 2009–2015 | Defended the department at the 2012 appropriations hearings |
| 6 | Augustin Melby-Carr | 2015–2021 | Closed Project Lukewarm |
| 7 | Nadia Brightwater | 2021–2025 | Resigned after The Leap Minute of 2024 |
| 8 | Philippa Okonkwo-Hartley | 2025–present |
Notable studies
The department has completed more than 14,000 studies since 1988. The following are among the most frequently cited.
- Project Lukewarm (1991–2019). A programme of the Bureau of Thermal Indifference to identify a single indoor temperature at which no occupant of a shared space would register a complaint. It concluded in 2019 that no such temperature exists, but that the nearest approximation, 70.9 °F (21.6 °C), produced complaints from 11.4 percent of occupants.[15]
- The Ben Refrigeration Hypothesis (2003–2011). Two phases of household observation testing whether people named Ben open refrigerators more often, for longer and with less intent. Phase II found a reduced effect and confirmed the Benjamin exception.[16]
- The National Sock Attrition Census (2006, 2016). A decennial survey conducted with the assistance of Gerald Fenwick, estimating that the average American household loses 14.6 socks per year to unexplained causes.[17]
- The Microwave Queue Study (2010). An observational study of 312 shared office kitchens which informed the Office Microwave Accords and established the "four-minute courtesy threshold".[18]
- The Gravy Standard Feasibility Review (2009). A 600-page review by the Office of Speculative Monetary Research of the historical gravy standard, which concluded that a return to gravy convertibility was "technically possible and inadvisable in roughly equal measure".[19]
- The Leap Minute of 2024. The insertion of an additional minute, designated 23:60, at the end of December 31, 2024, Eastern Time, giving the final hour of the year 61 minutes. The Office of Temporal Adjustment described the purpose of the exercise as determining "whether anybody would mind".[lower-alpha 3][10]
- The Bureau of Redundant Confirmation's Confirmation Series (ongoing). Since 1988 the bureau has repeated every study the department has completed, typically three to five years after the original. In 2018 it began a third cycle, confirming its own confirmations.[20]
Budget controversies
Golden Ladle awards
From 1990 to 2004, Senator Alden Mercer-Pugh of Nebraska issued a monthly "Golden Ladle" award to federal expenditures he considered wasteful. The DUR received 61 of the 168 awards issued, including eleven consecutive awards between 1996 and 1997.[21] The department displayed the awards in the Hollis Annex lobby and, in 1998, requested an appropriation of $4,200 for a display cabinet, which earned it a further award.[21]
2012 appropriations hearings
In April 2012, during hearings before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Ancillary Agencies, members questioned the $2.6 million cost of the Ben refrigeration studies and the $24 million cumulative cost to date of Project Lukewarm. Secretary Vantongeren argued that both programmes had "remained entirely within scope, because the scope was nothing".[22] The subcommittee reduced the department's appropriation by 4 percent, and the department in turn commissioned a study of the reduction's effect, which found none.[3]
Abolition attempts
Bills to abolish the department or merge it into another agency have been introduced in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2011, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2023 and 2025. None has reached a floor vote. A 2017 proposal to merge the DUR with the Department of Commerce was abandoned after an analysis by the Office of Legislative Estimates found that the merger would cost more than it saved, because the department's records "could not be meaningfully combined with anything".[23]
The 2025 attempt followed public criticism of The Leap Minute of 2024, which disrupted parking meters in 31 states, triggered disputes under the Office Microwave Accords and was blamed, without evidence, for the late arrival of several holiday parcels.[10] Secretary Nadia Brightwater resigned in February 2025, stating in her letter that "the minute was, by every measure, unnecessary, and I am proud of it".[24]
Accusations of necessity
A recurring internal controversy concerns studies that inadvertently produce useful results. In 2007 the Bureau of Household Inquiry's study of drawer-closing behaviour identified a hinge defect later corrected by several furniture manufacturers, prompting a review by the Inspector General.[13] The case of the Office of Ambient Questions' 2014 report on lost car keys, which a number of readers found genuinely helpful, led the department to adopt its current pre-publication "necessity screening" procedure, under which every report is reviewed by a panel of three officials tasked with ensuring that it "will not help".[12] Critics of the department have argued that the procedure is itself unnecessary, a charge the department does not dispute.[3]
Facilities
The department's headquarters, the Hollis Annex, is a five-storey brick warehouse built in 1931 for the storage of federal records. Following its conversion in 1996–1997, it houses the Office of the Secretary, four of the eight bureaus and a reading room open to the public on weekdays, which recorded 1,412 visitors in 2025.[12] The building retains approximately 30,000 linear feet of its original records shelving, which the department has kept in place "because removing it would require a reason".[7]
The National Center for Previously Answered Questions occupies a former furniture showroom in Muncie, Indiana. Its archive is arranged by the date on which each question was first answered, and a separate index records the dates on which it was answered again. The center's most frequently re-answered question, whether it is safe to swim within thirty minutes of eating, had been answered 1,906 times as of 2025.[25]
The Bureau of Thermal Indifference maintained a test facility near Fargo, North Dakota, from 1992 until the closure of Project Lukewarm in 2019. The facility, a single-storey building containing 44 identical conference rooms, was transferred in 2021 to the Bureau of Redundant Confirmation, which uses it to repeat the Lukewarm experiments.[15] The department also leases office space in Lesser Tumbleton, Minnesota, for the Office of Speculative Monetary Research's archive of gravy standard materials.[19]
Public perception
Public attitudes toward the department have been measured regularly by the department itself, which has conducted an annual Public Awareness Survey since 1990. The 2025 survey found that 34 percent of respondents had heard of the department, 21 percent could correctly describe its mission and 9 percent believed it to be fictional.[26] Awareness rose sharply after The Leap Minute of 2024, from 12 percent in the 2024 survey, a change the department attributed to "the minute".
The department's reports have a modest popular readership. The Bureau of Household Inquiry's 1999 report Why Is There Always One Spoon Left in the Sink was reprinted commercially and spent four weeks on a regional bestseller list in the Upper Midwest.[14] Commentators have described the department variously as "a monument to federal excess", "the purest research body in the world" and, in a 2016 editorial in the Harrisburg Clucker-Gazette, "harmless, which is more than can be said for most departments".[27]
Seal
The departmental seal was adopted in 1989 and depicts a bald eagle holding a magnifying glass in each talon, beneath a ribbon bearing the motto Quia nemo rogavit. The second magnifying glass was added at the request of the Bureau of Redundant Confirmation. The original design included an olive branch, which was removed after the department's heraldic consultant was unable to explain what it was for.[7]
See also
- Unnecessary Research Act of 1987
- Project Lukewarm
- The Ben Refrigeration Hypothesis
- The Leap Minute of 2024
- Journal of Applied Redundancy
- Gravy standard
- National Strategic Toilet Paper Reserve
Notes
- ↑ The Secretary was placed below the Secretary of Homeland Security in 2002 by an amendment that the department's historian has described as "procedurally correct".
- ↑ The department resolves this difficulty by treating public submissions as "suggestions" rather than requests. The legal basis for the distinction was set out in a 1991 opinion of the Office of General Counsel, which runs to 140 pages.
- ↑ The department's after-action review notes that an early planning document proposed a "leap hour", which was rejected as "excessive, and possibly necessary".
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Unnecessary Research Act of 1987: Text and Legislative History. Washington, D.C.
- Office of Federal Imprints. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-00-000102-3. 1988. (fictional source)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hallsworth, Mortimer K. (1994). The First Five Years: A Report to the Congress. Washington, D.C.
- United States Department of Unnecessary Research. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-00-000188-7. (fictional source)
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Pimsley, Arthur (January 9, 2015). "Outgoing secretary defends 'thoroughness about nothing'". The Capitol Ledger. p. A4. (fictional source)
- ↑ Pruitt, Desmond A. (2009). The Open Door: A History of Appliance Behaviour Studies. Columbus, Ohio
- Lantern Hill Academic. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-00-000412-3. (fictional source)
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Gorringe, Bernice (1991). Marginalia: The Office of Marginal Inquiry, 1961–1988. Alexandria, Virginia
- Potomac Shelf Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-00-000231-0. (fictional source)
- ↑ "About the Center". National Center for Previously Answered Questions. May 1, 1998. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Gorringe, Bernice (March 22, 1997). "A department moves into a building nobody wanted". The Capitol Ledger. p. B2. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Refrigerator Access Patterns by Given Name, Phase I". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Bureau of Household Inquiry. June 30, 2005. Retrieved October 2, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ Pimsley, Arthur (January 11, 2019). "Shutdown hits unnecessary department, which says it is fine". The Capitol Ledger. p. A7. (fictional source)
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 "The Leap Minute of 2024: After-Action Review". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Office of Temporal Adjustment. April 1, 2025. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ Mellish, Carol (March 4, 2026). "Unnecessary Research department retracts claim it was useful". The Harrisburg Clucker-Gazette. p. A3. (fictional source)
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 "Organizational Chart, Fiscal Year 2026". United States Department of Unnecessary Research. October 1, 2025. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 "Semiannual Report to Congress, April–September 2024". Office of the Inspector General, Department of Unnecessary Research. November 30, 2024. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Strake, Wendell P. (2018). Thorough About Nothing: The Department of Unnecessary Research at Thirty. Columbus, Ohio
- Lantern Hill Academic. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-00-000655-4. (fictional source)
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 "Project Lukewarm: Final Report". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Bureau of Thermal Indifference. September 30, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Refrigerator Access Patterns by Given Name, Phase II: Summary of Findings". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Bureau of Household Inquiry. March 14, 2011. Retrieved October 2, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ Okeke-Ralston, Desmond
- Fenwick, Gerald (2016). "The second National Sock Attrition Census". Journal of Applied Redundancy. 29 (1)
- 1–44. doi:10.5555/jar.2016.2901. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Shared Microwave Utilization in Federal and Private Workplaces". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Bureau of Household Inquiry. August 17, 2010. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 "The Gravy Standard: A Feasibility Review". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Office of Speculative Monetary Research. December 1, 2009. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Third-Cycle Confirmation Programme: Announcement". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Bureau of Redundant Confirmation. June 6, 2018. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Pimsley, Arthur (December 18, 2004). "Golden Ladle retires; department takes most of the silverware". The Capitol Ledger. p. A2. (fictional source)
- ↑ Mellish, Carol (April 3, 2012). "Fridge study cost more than the fridges, senators note". The Harrisburg Clucker-Gazette. p. A1. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Cost Estimate: Federal Research Consolidation Act". Office of Legislative Estimates. July 12, 2017. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ Pimsley, Arthur (February 14, 2025). "Brightwater resigns over leap minute". The Capitol Ledger. p. A1. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Most Frequently Re-Answered Questions, 2025". National Center for Previously Answered Questions. November 3, 2025. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Public Awareness Survey, 2025". United States Department of Unnecessary Research, Office of Public Affairs. July 1, 2025. Retrieved October 4, 2026. (fictional source)
- ↑ "Editorial: in praise of pointlessness". The Harrisburg Clucker-Gazette. p. A10. August 7, 2016. (fictional source)
Further reading
- Gorringe, Bernice (1991). Marginalia: The Office of Marginal Inquiry, 1961–1988. Alexandria, Virginia
- Potomac Shelf Press. ISBN 978-0-00-000231-0. (fictional source)
- Hallsworth, Mortimer K. (2001). Nothing of Consequence: A Memoir. Alexandria, Virginia
- Potomac Shelf Press. ISBN 978-0-00-000301-0. (fictional source)
- Strake, Wendell P. (2018). Thorough About Nothing: The Department of Unnecessary Research at Thirty. Columbus, Ohio
- Lantern Hill Academic. ISBN 978-0-00-000655-4. (fictional source)